What does it mean when you hear, "Overhead Supply"? How does that help anyone?

The market is a beautiful thing. It's driven by supply and demand dynamics, or buyers and sellers, based on reasons that we don't need to know. I've noticed that the majority of market participants like to worry about the "why?". We choose to worry about the "Where, When and For How Long?". It seems like a much better use of our time, particularly if our only goal is to make money. We're not interested in writing gossip columns.

For me, overhead supply is when there are an overwhelming amount of sellers relative to the amount of buyers around a certain price. Sometimes you get the smartass in the room that says, "Well JC for every buyer there must be a seller". Yes, dummy, but there aren't an equivalent amount of willing buyers and sellers and every price. That's why stocks move.

From the desk of Tom Bruni @BruniCharting

Telecom continues to hold up well, sticking with the "reach for yield" theme we've been discussing month in and month out for a while now.

Let's take a look at the ETF and a few individual names we want to be buying to take advantage of this trend.

"JC I only trade U.S. Stocks" 

"Who cares what Belgium is doing"

"Indian bank stocks? Why are you looking at those?"

Stocks in America don't go up and down because of what is happening in America. Stocks in America go up and down because of what is happening all over the world. This relationship also applies to bonds, commodities and currency markets.

Today I want to focus on what we're seeing globally so we can make much more informed decisions about the current trend. Do we want to be buying stocks or do we want to be selling them?

From the desk of Tom Bruni @BruniCharting

The market remains a “hot mess", so we’re looking under the surface at breadth and risk appetite measures to identify clues as to the potential direction that this 15-month range will resolve itself.

Today I want to look at one of those measures, Consumer Discretionary stocks vs Consumer Staples.

If you're a long-only fund manager that believes the market is headed higher, you're going to be in more aggressive areas of the market like Discretionary. If you believe the market is headed lower or isn't going to do much, you're going to be in the lower beta, often higher dividend Consumer Staple stocks.

So what's happening in these sectors right now?

The Equal-Weight Consumer Discretionary vs Equal-Weight Consumer Staples continues to struggle with a flat 200-day moving average and confluence of support/resistance, but just made new 6-month highs this week. While this chart still work to do to confirm an intermediate-term uptrend, this is extremely constructive action and is suggesting that risk appetite among market participants is beginning to pick up.

Click on chart to enlarge...

I've been talking markets with Liz Claman for the better part of the last decade. Whenever I'm in New York, I like to swing by the FOX studios to say hello. This week we discussed the relative strength in Semi's and how I think they will lead stocks and the S&P500 to new all-time highs.

Here is the clip:

I'm in New York this week for the annual CMT Association Symposium. I always learn so much at this event, not just from the presentations, but from the attendees themselves. A lot of smart folks in one room is a win for all of us.

Tuesday I was up at the Nasdaq to chat with Catherine Murray about the S&P500, my favorite Semiconductor names and where we are in Canadian Equities and Crude Oil.

Here is the video in full:

Last week's Chart of The Week discussed the "One More High" type setup we often see  prior to price consolidations or pullbacks, providing some context around why we continue to remain structurally bullish, but not very aggressive in the short-term.

Friday we got new Monthly Candlesticks, so this post will outline a few of the major changes since last month.

From the desk of Tom Bruni @BruniCharting

One of the topics I spoke about during my Chart Summit presentation on breadth last month was the relative performance of Equally-Weighted versus Cap-Weighted Indexes.

I always hear that the market cannot go higher on an absolute basis if the Equally-Weighted S&P 500 is underperforming the Cap-Weighted.

So is that the case? Let's take a look.

From the desk of Tom Bruni @BruniCharting

It's been about three weeks since I wrote this post looking at breadth across various Equity markets since January 2018.

JC wrote a post today about "The Cards We've Been Dealt" which references some of these stats, so I wanted to update some of them and highlight another way we use them to measure breadth.

We have to play the cards we're dealt. Like it or not, this is the environment we're forced to invest in, but only if you want to. You don't have to invest. Cash has been a viable option for 6 months. It's worked out great. Most stocks, sectors, US and International Indexes are still below their January 2018 highs. I can give you the exact numbers like we provide for our Institutional Customers, but just take my word for it. It's not even close. We've been in a 14-month sideways range, or downtrend, depending on who you ask. Either way, it's not an uptrend for most stocks.

Now, this 14-month nothing burger comes within the context of a major bull market in stocks, that arguably started in 2016. After a monster run throughout 2016 and 2017, the stock market, both U.S. and abroad, has consolidated those gains. It seems perfectly normal, and well deserved, if you ask me.

We've been erring on the long side of stocks for the last 6 weeks, taking trades where the reward/risk is heavily skewed in our favor, but are still seeing mixed evidence regarding the market's ability to make new highs in the short-term.