Are investors really buying bonds, betting on a squeeze higher?
Perhaps it’s just my Twitter feed. (Or are we calling it "X" now?)
I’m perplexed by the growing chatter around picking the bottom in bonds.
Warning: Picking bottoms is never a good look.
It’s unbecoming, especially when there are zero signs of a reversal. (The same applies to tops.)
I understand the Nasdaq 100 had its best first half – like, ever.
But what does that have to do with yield charts?
Rates continue to rise worldwide.
Here’s a look at Germany, France, Portugal, and US benchmark rates:
All are steadily grinding higher following explosive advances last year. Yet none have decisively resolved to the upside from their respective multi-month ranges.
The European yields posted year-to-date highs in early March, while the 10-year US Treasury yield reached its year-to-date peak last week.
I’ve parroted my bond outlook during internal meetings and across our Slack channels in recent weeks, partly in jest but mostly to highlight the underlying uptrend in rates.
Honestly, I’m not crazy about selling the short end of the curve, though I believe there’s a trade there.
Instead, there are far better opportunities with longer-duration bonds.
Shorting bonds isn’t the most popular play with the Fed and the dollar and the CPI…
But that makes me like this trade even more, especially when I put the headlines and the dominant narrative aside and simply focus on the charts…
Check out the 10-year yield $TNX:
The US benchmark rate remains within a well-defined uptrend, resolving higher from one bullish continuation pattern after another. And it’s showing no signs of a trend reversal.
Yes, investors continue to react, unpacking Jerome Powell’s words while looking ahead to next month’s meeting. It’s a never-ending cycle proffered by unrelenting data.
But it’s this constant flux that makes the market the most engaging puzzle in the world (aside from life, of course).
Yet one piece of the puzzle renders the chaos manageable…
The closing price.
That’s the main reason I choose to devote the majority of my energy to price charts. The closing price is seldom revised, acting as an anchor during turbulent conditions.
Call me old school, but price is never wrong.
With that in mind, let’s take a fresh look at a key intermarket ratio many (including me) have labeled “broken”...
Investors are running from imminent global collapse by reaching for emerging market bonds over risk-free US Treasuries.
Wait, perhaps I heard it wrong.
It could have been a US economic collapse.
Or was it the Chinese yuan replacing the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency?
Honestly, I don't pay much attention to the doom and gloom. (But I do find it amusing.)
I’m not the only one ignoring the bad vibes.
The markets are also disregarding the fear mongers…
Check out the Emerging Bond ETF (EMB) versus the US Treasuries ETF (IEF) ratio overlaid with the S&P 500 ETF (SPY):
These two lines follow a similar path – a path currently driven by burgeoning risk appetite.
Investors prefer riskier EM bonds over their safer US counterparts as the EMB/IEF ratio prints fresh highs. So it isn’t surprising those risk-on attitudes are spilling over into the S&P 500 $SPY.
US interest rates have churned within a tight range for months.
Remember: Sideways is a trend.
While intermarket evidence suggests a breakdown in yields, they simply refuse to roll over.
It makes perfect sense when we zoom out…
Rates are in a well-defined structural uptrend!
Check out the US 30-year Treasury yield overlaid with live cattle futures:
They look almost identical as both exhibit the classic base-on-base formation – one upside resolution followed by another.
To be clear, I’m not proposing a grand thesis regarding a strong positive correlation between long-duration rates and live cattle futures, or what the next directional move in live cattle and rates mean for AI stocks (though I haven’t dismissed the idea).
Instead, I’m simply observing the trend that began in early 2020.
I chose to place live cattle futures on the chart for effect – a...
Classic intermarket ratios – copper versus gold, regional banks $KRE versus REITs $IYR, and the Russell 2000 $IWM versus the S&P 500 $SPY – all point to lower yields.
This has been going on for months. Some may argue that these ratios are broken or no longer carry significant insight into the direction of rates.
It may be true that the strong relationship between the above ratios and interest rates has indeed decoupled.
But it’s not solely relative trends hinting at declining yields.
The stocks that benefit the most from a rising rate environment also look terrible on absolute terms…
The ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF $EQRR tells the story:
Financials, industrials, and energy comprise over 75% of EQRR. These market...
Growth stocks seem concerned with only one thing – printing fresh highs.
The Tech sector ETF $XLK posted new 52-week highs yesterday. And the Communications ETF $XLC rallied within reach after taking out its Aug. ‘22 pivot highs.
So where does that leave bonds and other long-duration assets?
If these base breakouts across growth sectors hold, I imagine bonds have some serious catching up to do…
Why?
Growth stocks tend to trend with bonds since they’re both long-duration assets. Changes in interest rates directly impact US Treasuries and affect tech stocks more than other equities.
Check out the tight relationship between the Long-Term Treasury ETF $TLT and the Technology sector $XLK: